- Mayor of London wants London to become a leader in offsite manufacturing
- Light industrial workspace under threat
- The London Assembly unanimously agrees a motion on the London attacks at an extraordinary meeting earlier today.
- I want to encourage you all to respond to this woefully inadequate clean air draft consultation!
- Sadiq launches Air Quality consultation – have your say!
- Attending #LPC17? ...Safe journey to Brighton 🌹 Warm welcome to those attending for the first time. May it be the first of many. #Lab17 1 hour ago
- RT @MayorofLondon: .@metpoliceuk have confirmed that the explosion on a train at Parsons Green Station is being treated as terrorism. https… 1 week ago
- "We want London to be a centre of excellence" pleased @MayorofLondon wants London to become a leader in off-sight m… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 1 week ago
- RT @LondonAssembly: Mayor's Question Time #MQT has begun. You can watch Assembly Members question @MayorofLondon LIVE here: https://t.co/Ai… 1 week ago
- We heard robust evidence from all over London – Old Oak Common, Park Royal and more. 2 weeks ago
Last month, we set out why women in Britain are better off in Europe. The EU has been a powerful force for driving gender equality and empowering women, but our hard won rights and protections would be at risk if the UK were to leave the European Union. You can read our full article on LabourList here.
With just over a week until the UK goes to the polls it is crucial that we speak to as many women as possible about what Europe means for women- on jobs, pay and rights at work. We can’t trust the Tories to uphold and protect women’s rights.
Will you join us by pledging to help speak to women voters?
Here’s how you can get involved:
- Attend a campaign session near you this weekend — details of your nearest event can be found here
- Organise a coffee morning or lunchtime chat with your friends and colleagues. You could distribute our women’s leaflet which you can find here
- Pledge to call five women in your contacts who haven’t yet made up their mind, and persuade them to vote remain. You can find some key arguments for remaining in the EU here.
This will be vital for the campaign. Thank you.
Harriet Harman MP
Kate Green MP
I was delighted to see an excellent contribution for the case to remain from Bianca Jagger on the Huffington Post:
“The EU Referendum Will Determine Our Future
Britain and the referendum
Great Britain is my adopted home. I have deep affection for this nation — for its people, for its great tradition of liberalism, its commitment to justice and human rights. For its art, literature, theatre, music and film, its long record of ground-breaking scientific discoveries, its beautiful countryside, its National Health Service… I could go on.
The EU referendum on June 23 will be one of the most significant decisions British citizens will ever have to make. The outcome will affect how the UK is governed, national security, the economy, human rights, the environment, culture… every aspect of our lives. It will define what it means to be British and could alter this country’s relationship with the world for generations to come.
Rhetoric of the “Leave Campaign”
I watched in disbelief as some British leaders resorted to racist rhetoric in the lead-up to the referendum. Boris Johnson made a notorious comment about the EU in his interview with the Telegraph: “Napoleon, Hitler, various people tried this out, and it ends tragically… The EU is an attempt to do this by different methods.” Mr Johnson should remember “Godwin’s Law,” which states that in any argument, the first person to mention the Nazis is deemed the loser. Both the leave and remain campaigns have descended to fear-mongering but Boris Johnson has arguably stooped the lowest, by comparing the EU to Nazi Germany. I say “arguably” because he has some tough competition.
A recent poster for the “Leave” campaign, released on the eve of an England v. Turkey football match, shrieked: “Turkey (population 76 million) is joining the EU,” warning Britain of an invasion of murderous, kidnapping, gunrunning Turks. Another depicts an EU passport as an open door, with footprints leading through it, and the caption, “Turkey (population 76 million) is joining the EU. Vote Leave, take back control.” Never mind that this is factually untrue — as Polly Toynbee’s excellent article in the Guardian, which can be read here, explains. This has, increasingly, been the failsafe tactic of the “leave” campaign — xenophobic attempts to persuade British citizens that there is a marauding army of Eastern European and Turkish criminals poised to descend upon the UK. The question of the EU has brought out great passion on both sides of the argument — it has also exposed the latent prejudice at the heart of the “Leave” campaign.
Some of the leaders of the “Leave” campaign seem to have forgotten their history: the purpose and achievements of the European Union. Winston Churchill spoke in 1946 after the Second World War, of the need for a united Europe, “under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and in freedom.” The European Union was formed to preserve that peace and the EU has been largely responsible for keeping it, ever since. The leaders of the “Leave” campaign seem to have forgotten that the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, for its contribution to “over six decades… of the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.” The Nobel committee president Thorbjoern Jagland said, the EU has played a critical role in transforming a European “continent of war” into a “continent of peace.”
War in Europe — Remembering Srebrenica
I do not take “peace, safety and freedom” in Europe for granted.
In 1993 I travelled to the former Yugoslavia to document the mass rape of Bosnian women by Serbian forces, as part of their campaign of ethnic cleansing. Between 1992 and 1995 Bosnian Serb troops cut a bloody swathe through the Bosnian Muslim population, to the cost of over a hundred thousand civilian lives. Over two million people were forced to flee their homes. The war culminated in the genocide at Srebrenica on 11th July 1995, where 8,373 Bosnian Muslims — civilians, women, children and virtually the entire male population – were systematically slaughtered by Bosnian Serb troops in cold blood during four days of carnage. It was the worst massacre on European soil since the Third Reich. The war did not involve any EU member states.
When issuing the indictment against General Ratko Mladic at the War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, Judge Fouad Riad described “scenes of unimaginable savagery, thousands of men executed and buried in mass graves, hundreds of men buried alive, men and women mutilated and slaughtered, children killed before their mothers’ eyes, a grandfather forced to eat the liver of his own grandson. These are truly scenes from Hell, written on the darkest pages of human history.”
For those of who have lived in peace in the EU for so long, such ‘scenes from Hell’ are unimaginable. We must not forget that the EU is more than an economic entity. It is a vital peacekeeping force in Europe.
EU Unity, Diversity
I was born in Managua, Nicaragua and educated in France — I have dual nationality, and I choose to live in the UK. My daughter was born in Paris, my granddaughters, my little grandson and great granddaughter were all born in the UK.
In the past, the UK’s outlook seemed to me to incorporate the best parts of the European Union’s ethos of inclusion, solidarity and diversity. The EU anthem, from Beethoven’s 9th symphony, has no words, to show that no one language has precedence. The stars on the flag are arranged in a circle to show that there is no hierarchy between countries. The EU motto is “United in diversity.”
We all know that the EU is not a perfect institution, but to abandon it in favour of a policy of isolationism would be to throw the baby out with the bathwater, as the saying goes. Britain draws great strength from its relationship with Europe. To cut ourselves adrift from this common heritage with the EU, our economic, political and cultural ally, would weaken Britain and its place in the world. I am deeply troubled by about the possibility of Britain’s leaving the European Union.
As someone who has dedicated their life to defending human rights, peace and civil liberties, I welcome the EU as a progressive force, holding countries to high, common standards for human rights. Abolition of the death penalty is a pre-condition for entry into the Union and the EU is the leading institutional actor and largest donor to the worldwide fight against the death penalty. It maintains close tieswith the Council of Europe, which has made worldwide abolition of capital punishment one of its governing objectives, and is dedicated to promoting democracy, rule of law, human rights and economic development in the EU. I have been Council of Europe Goodwill Ambassador for the Abolition of the Death Penalty since 2003.
The EU has enshrined in law important protections for women’s rights, LGBTI rights and workers rights. All EU member states are required to fulfill the “Copenhagen Criteria” as a prerequisite: members must be ‘stable institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.’
We are at a critical juncture in the history of women’s rights. There is an important proposal currently making its way through the EU Parliament, for EU-wide ratification of the Istanbul Convention of the Council of Europe, the most comprehensive International Treaty on combating violence against women and girls. Twelve EU countries have already ratified the Convention, thirteen have signed, but not ratified it. The UK signed the Convention on the 8th of June 2012 but has not yet ratified it. I urge Prime Minister David Cameron to make ratification of the Istanbul Convention an urgent priority.
The EU has a number of other pioneering pieces of legislation such as the European Protection Order by which survivors of sexual assault or domestic violence who are granted legal protection such as a restraining order in one EU country are entitled to the same legal protection if they move to another EU country. The EU also guarantees equal rights to a pension. Women are often excluded from company pension schemes because they work part time and take breaks to have children. “EU law now prevents discrimination and guarantees equal rights for all social security benefits.” EU law requires that a woman’s job be held open so she can return to work without loss of status or pay. This is progress from the days when women were routinely sacked for becoming pregnant – this still took place in the UK until the late 1970’s — but we are not progressing fast enough in the UK or anywhere else on creating gender equality. We have not even achieved the minimum standard of equal pay for women in most countries. I believe that these EU legislative protections for women are of paramount importance.
Climate change is the greatest threat we face in our time. I have participated at the United Nations climate change conferences since 2007, in my role as Founder, President and Chief Executive of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation. The European Union has often been the voice of reason in those fraught international negotiations. The EU has some of the most ambitious targets in the world on reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change. The EU “Climate and Energy Framework” pledges a reduction of at least 40% in greenhouse gas emissions relative to 1990 levels, at least 27% share for renewable energy, and at least 27% improvement in energy efficiency — all by 2030.
As for environmental protection, the EU’s Natura 2000 program is the largest coordinated network of conservation areas in the world, covering 18 % of the land area and 6% of its marine territory, offering protection to Europe’s most valuable and threatened biodiversity.
The UK government’s environmental track record is far from perfect. Prime Minister David Cameron has unreservedly endorsed fracking. Last year ten conservation groups including the National Trust, GreenPeace and the RSPB expressed their concern at the dangerous ‘watering down’ of the UK’s environmental policies. I fear that if Great Britain were to leave Europe, we could be left to the tender mercies of the UK government.
A Rich Cultural Tapestry
The creative industries in Britain thrive on a relationship with Europe. Last week I went to Glyndebourne to see Il Barbiere Di Siviglia, or the Barber of Seville. The production was sparkling, witty, hilarious. The opera was directed by a British woman and conducted by a Spanish man, sung by Italian and German baritones, as well as an American tenor and an Australian-American soprano. According to a letter signed by 282 leading figures from film, music, theatre, literature, dance, design, the arts, and fashion, including Sir Tom Stoppard, Tracey Emin, Poet Laureate Carol Ann Duffy, Wolfgang Tillmans, Hans Ulrich Obrist, Sir Patrick Stewart, Sir Anish Kapoor, Benedict Cumberbatch, John le Carré, Dame Kristin Scott Thomas, Steve McQueen and Dame Vivienne Westwood among many others, the British arts are stronger within a united European Union. It is a fact that EU funding has been critical in helping the UK film industry flourish- the Creative Europe programme provided critical seed money for Oscar winning films British films such as The King’s Speech, The Iron Lady and Slumdog Millionaire. But perhaps even more significant than money, says the letter, is the creative exchange between countries – the collaborative, artistic endeavours that being part of a European community makes possible.
Britain’s relationship with the EU is equally critical to the sciences, according to a letter to the Times signed by more than 150 fellows of the Royal Society. Steven Hawking calls the Brexit ‘a disaster for UK science… Being able to attract and fund the most talented Europeans assures the future of British science and also encourages the best scientists elsewhere to come here…’ The UK holds a preeminent place in the world of the arts and sciences, and this could be jeopardized by leaving Europe.
103 universities have also come out in favour of the ‘Remain’ campaign, including Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, UCL and Edinburgh. “While no one is suggesting that UK universities could not survive outside the EU,” they write, “leaving would mean cutting ourselves off from established networks and would undermine the UK’s position as a global leader in science and the arts.”
Europe is currently open to young British people from all walks of life. In one of the worst economic climates in living memory, the ability to travel and work in Europe has been a lifeline for them. It is no surprise that at a student debate in Leeds in February, 298 of the 300 students present wanted Britain to stay in the EU. Their generation has grown up with the economic and cultural advantages of being part of Europe. They cannot imagine anything else. As well as work, young people can travel to see galleries, architecture, theatre, beautiful landscapes, and great cathedrals all across the continent. I hope that future generations will be not denied this opportunity.
Those who complain about the influx of European migrants and refugees also forget that it goes both ways — there are 1.4 million Britons currently living in Europe. Their lives would be seriously impacted in a number of ways, including recall to the UK, increased taxes in their EU country of residence, or the withdrawal of benefits such as healthcare. After the Brexit, no more Britons could relocate to an EU country with such ease.
I was very moved by the photographer Wolfgang Tillmans beautiful posters urging Britain to stay in the EU. It is true that I am politically aligned with Tillmans on this issue – but the fact remains that these images provide a strong contrast to the racist rhetoric of the “Leave” campaign. ‘No man is an island. No country by itself.’ says the simply printed text, superimposed on a stark aerial view of the UK coastline. Another, showing a softly blurred image of a vivid blue horizon, says, “What is lost is lost forever.” Tillman’s posters are not part of an official campaign — he made them on his own initiative, with the help of his London and Berlin studio assistants. They are a passionate personal plea, from an artist who believes that the EU is ‘the largest peace project in human history.’
I fervently believe that the UK must remain in the EU if it is committed to being part of a better, more peaceful, more just, more diverse, more tolerant, more economically secure world. I also believe that to leave the EU is to slip backwards, perhaps irrevocably, into isolationism and xenophobia – all in the name of misplaced self-interest and fear. Winston Churchill said in 1963 that ‘The future of Europe if Britain were to be excluded is black indeed.” I believe that our future, were the UK to leave the EU, would be equally black.”
In May 2016, our first meeting following the Mayoral election, the Assembly passed the following motion in support of the UK’s continued membership of the EU:
“This Assembly supports the United Kingdom’s continued membership of the European Union and, in particular, the economic, workplace, security, and environmental benefits this brings to the people of London.
“This Assembly notes the advantages of remaining within the European Union in the following areas:
Economic benefits to London of EU membership
Trade: The EU’s single market is London’s most important trade relationship – responsible for 30-40% of the capital’s total exports; being part of the single market supports London’s status as an international economic hub; and 40% of the world’s largest 250 companies choose London for their headquarters, with almost half citing access to Europe as the core reason for investing.
Business: The Confederation of British Industry reports that “71% of CBI member businesses report that the UK’s membership of the EU has had an overall positive impact on their business, including 67% of SME members.”
Immigration: Despite the scaremongering and inflammatory rhetoric surrounding EU migration, European migrants to the UK are not a drain on Britain’s finances and, instead, pay £20bn more in taxes than they receive in state benefits.
Social benefits to London of EU membership:
Maternity Rights: The EU Pregnant Workers Directive (1994) introduced a right to paid time off for ante-natal care; got rid of the qualifying period for unfair dismissal in pregnancy and maternity cases; and gave women the right to a suitable alternative job if they were made redundant while on maternity leave.
Protection against working excessive hours: Working time protections have been targeted by leading ‘Brexit’ campaigners, who claim they are red-tape that should be scrapped. In fact, the EU Working Time Directive’s rules have deterred many bosses from forcing London’s workers into an average working week of longer than 48 hours. Since its introduction, over a million workers across the UK are no longer compelled to work excessive hours.
Minimum workplace protections: Improvement of working conditions; freedom of association and collective bargaining; equal treatment for men and women; information, consultation and participation of workers; health protection and safety at the workplace; and protection of children, adolescents, elderly persons, and disabled persons from labour market exploitation are provided as minimum protections for workers in all Member States. Withdrawal from the EU threatens these protections for workers in the London, as U.K Governments would no longer be required to provide them.
Security benefits to London of EU membership
Extradition: The European Arrest Warrant allows the UK to extradite individuals from other member states to face prosecution or to serve a prison sentence for an existing conviction. In the period 2011-2015 the Met made 1,735 arrests under the EAW. It is because of this that Hussein Osman, a terrorist involved in the failed 21/7 London bomb plot, was sentenced to 40 years in prison after being returned to Britain from Italy.
Cross Border Crime: Britain’s membership of the EU allows the Metropolitan Police to engage in extensive police co-operation through Europol. This has helped combat the trafficking of drugs and human beings as well as cyber-crime and money laundering.
Information Sharing: Although part of the Schengen information sharing area, the UK is not part of the Schengen passport free area. Security controls remain in place at UK borders and the UK can return migrants to the European country they first arrived to be processed. Under the Schengen Information System 11, it is possible to issue Europe-wide alerts for missing people and property.
Environmental benefits to London of EU membership
Air Quality: The EU Air Quality Directive has compelled the Mayor of London to look at policy measures such as the Ultra-Low Emission Zone. Without the pressure of directives such as these, the Mayor and UK Government would have a reduced obligation to tackle London’s toxic air. Boris Johnson’s apparent suppression of a report – while Mayor of London – linking air pollution and deprived schools, provides the strongest possible insight in to likely impact on pollution in the capital following a vote to leave the EU.
The Thames: European regulations on sewage discharges have provided a major impetus for action to clean up the Thames. The Thames was declared “biologically dead” in the 1950s. Its modern renaissance with the return of fish and mammals has been in no small part down to the impact of EU law. Leaving the EU would put that progress at risk.
Climate Change: Four-fifths of the environmental legislation now in force in the UK derives from EU law. Leaving the EU would seriously inhibit our ability to work co-operatively with our neighbours on issues that transcend borders, such as the existential threat of climate change. As London is a climate estuarial city, reducing the UK’s influence over the global response to climate change represents a direct threat to the long-term viability of the capital.
“While far superior to the isolationist alternative offered by those campaigning for ‘Brexit’, this Assembly does not view the current European Union a ‘finished product’. Rather, the EU is an evolving institution, which is a product of those nations that actively participate in it.
“This Assembly wishes to see a reformed European Union, which is more democratically accountable, as part of a drive towards a ‘Social Europe’ – characterised by greater prosperity, high living standards, and good working conditions for all.
“This Assembly believes Londoners should reject the shallow, populist rhetoric of those encouraging Londoners to vote for ‘Brexit’, and encourages the people of London to vote for the United Kingdom to remain part of the European Union.”
The outgoing Mayor has bent over backwards to wave this luxury development through. With a net loss of over 4000 jobs in central London and not one affordable home, Londoners are once again losing out. This looks like a gift to the developers.
See this article in The Guardian:
I spent Wednesday campaigning with Sadiq and the London Assembly Croydon & Sutton candidate, Marina Ahmad, in Sutton.
Sutton is an Outer London, Liberal Democrat led borough that is currently consulting on de-designating a number of its green spaces currently protected as Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land. These are not scrubby bits of land but the designations include recreation grounds, woodlands, Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation, a tennis and country club and parts of the Wandle Valley Regional Park. There are also concerns three allotments sites, a sports fields and a recreation ground may be de-designated. These sites are:
- Land West of Wellfield Gardens
- Land to the West of Beddington Lane A
- Land to the West of Beddington Lane B
- Land north of Kimpton Park Way
- Part of Rosehill Recreation Ground
- the Tennis Centre at Rosehill Recreation Ground
- Reigate Avenue Recreation Ground (this is referred to as S94 in the Draft Policy on the Green Belt and MOL but identified as S93 in the Draft Local Plan)
- Surrey Tennis and Country Club
- Land at Jessops Way
- Land North of Bedzed
Sadiq’s manifesto is firmly committed to protecting open space. He has a suite of policies strengthening protection for wildlife, sites of nature conservation, biodiversity, Metropolitan Open Land and above all, the Green Belt. Sadiq wants London to be 50% open space; he understands its importance to individual Londoners’ lives and the future of the planet. Fundamentally, this is a very strong environmental manifesto.
Figures from the Campaign to Protect Rural England confirm Sutton’s consultation proposals now brings the total of threatened Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land up to 69.
Today (Friday) Sadiq visited Old Farm Park, a 16 acre open space in Erith, Bexley which the Conservative Council are selling off for development. As he said this morning “Bexley’s plan to sell off precious green space is a disgrace. Local residents are paying the price for having a weak Tory mayor and Tory council”
You can find more details around Sutton’s proposal to de-designate Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land in their Local Plan “Sutton 2031”. The Green Belt policy can be found on page 112
You can find out more about the Old Farm Park campaign here
To join Sadiq on the campaign trail, find upcoming sessions here
Join me tonight for an open public meeting, featuring:
Lisa Nandy MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change
Seb Dance MEP, Labour’s spokesperson in Europe on Energy and Climate Change
Cllr Feryal Demirci, Hackney Council lead, Neighbourhoods and Sustainability
Green issues are playing more of a part in the campaign to be London mayor than ever before and Labour’s candidate, Sadiq Khan, has committed to being London’s “greenest mayor”: extending the ultra low emissions zone, divesting London pensions funds of fossil fuel investments, encouraging solar and other renewable energy, cleaning up the bus fleet and promoting cycling and electric cars.
At local, city-wide, national and international level, the guests will be discussing what Labour can do to achieve a just transition to a zero carbon world.
Newington Green Unitarian Church, 39A Newington Green, N16 9PR London
72% of women in prison have two or more diagnosed mental health problems and 30% of them have a previous psychiatric admission prior to prison.
This raises serious questions about the wisdom of imprisoning so many women.
The brilliant Sara Hyde wrote about the issue for International Women’s Day, and I want to share it with you now: http://labourlist.org/2016/03/we-cannot-afford-the-failures-of-womens-imprisonment/