I challenged Johnson on welfare cap

When the government started rolling out the housing benefit cap earlier this year, I argued in the Guardian and elsewhere that London will be hardest hit – and the Mayor wasn’t doing enough to stop it. Now, as we approach the April 2013 imposition of the total benefit cap, and the evidence clearly shows that high living costs in the capital means that Londoners will once again suffer most, I have challenged the Mayor on his utter failure to tackle this issue.

At the November session of Mayor’s Question Time, I pressed Boris on why he has refused to ask for a regional variation in the benefits cap. You can listen to the exchange online here:

Higher costs of living means London will suffer most from the government’s total benefits cap. Even Boris has admitted that London is home to 87% of the country’s claimants – many of whom are in work or working households –  who would be hardest hit. Yet he has failed to argue for a regional variation, which would compensate for the higher living costs.

At last week’s Mayor’s Question Time, I pressed the Mayor on his failure to argue for a variation based on London’s unique circumstances: “The boroughs are saying that 63,000 claimants are going to be very hard hit and will have to move out (and remember a lot of these claimants are in work). There are 50k households with 3, 4, or 5 children; that’s 180k children who will inevitably be hit by this, and I want to ask you – you always say you have constructive ongoing dialogue with government – you say the reforms are necessary but why don’t you recognise the impact on London and ask for a regional variation on the caps?”

But he wouldn’t commit. Earlier in the discussion, he hid behind “transitional arrangements” he has previously negotiated, and added “what we’re trying to do is assess the scale of that but the transitional measures we negotiated are having an effect (extra cash for London and delay)”.

I responded “the thing about transitional arrangements is that they’re just that: transitional.” I continued by asking if he recognised the scale of the problem: “You referred the Guardian story which shows… that 17 Labour and Conservative boroughs having to move residents out of London because they cannot find rented accommodation in their boroughs – or indeed within London – which are below the housing benefit cap. And this is before we get into the total benefit cap… Do you think you’ve severely misjudged this situation?”

The Mayor’s reply was extraordinary. He said that, in respect of people being forced to move across London or even across the country, that “it is natural for there to be such moves”. And he downplayed the devastating impact this will have on the city and its (current) residents: “I have said I didn’t want to see a mass exodus. I used some colourful language about Kosovo-style, with convoys of saucepan [inaudible], dog carts, and so on – that is not going to happen.”

In short, the hallowing out of London won’t be fast, and there won’t be images reminiscent of a war-torn country.

You can hear the back-and-forth here on the video above, or by visiting my YouTube page here.

Video of the full Question Time can be viewed here: Mayor’s Question Time, 21 November 2012

Advertisements

About nickygavron

Former Deputy Mayor for London, London Assembly Member, Chair of Planning Committee, and Labour Spokesperson for Planning
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to I challenged Johnson on welfare cap

  1. Opinion says:

    I can’t afford to live in London, W1. So why should my taxes go to pay for poor people to live in posh Boroughs?

    Labour have lost the moral argument on benefit caps. Torys make a valid point, is £26,000 (tax free) an unreasonable amount of money?.

    There is great inequality in London postcodes, which the assembly should review. You perfection of London is of 32 distinct Boroughs, rather then a single city. It is time, we abolished London Underground zones. Property prices are higher if a home is within Zone 2 rather then a Zone 3.

    Labour make a big deal about social housing. Many of those people are not deserving. I get a lot of crime and bad behaviour which is linked to social housing. It is not fair, my taxes go to pay for these people. I am terrified to walk down the street.

  2. Paul says:

    I feel your pain Opinion. The trouble is that the labour party’s position on this issue is akin to student politics. On the one hand they say they are trying to protect the poor and work towards a “progressive” Utopian world and yet it was they who passed the climate change act which is the most expensive piece of legislation in the history of the UK.
    So following this religious belief where carbon dioxide is the greatest evil ever produced by mankind the acolytes, Nicky Gavron being the chief high priest, think that by raising energy bills and building useless wind farms in an attempt to appease Gaia, Mother Earth, and creating a carbon credit market the climate will somehow turn, erm, “normal”.
    One of the downsides of the policies of this religion is that people die.
    Every winter the elderly (those poor, working class, proletarian folk that Nicky professes to defend die in their homes because they make the choice not to heat their homes because they can’t afford to. Cold is a killer.
    This post will not be published because it offends the sensibilities of those who follow the religion such is the indoctrination which has afflicted those believers.
    The funny thing about Boris Johnson is that he was an arch anti-environmentalist until he was elected Mayor. Poor bloke they got to him too.

  3. Paul says:

    Blimey it seems my post has been published. I need a drink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s